RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03372
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, Block 11 should read 3N0X1, Public Affairs, 18 months;
42652, Jet Engine Mechanic, 3 years and 2 months.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) left the additional Air
Force Specialty Code (AFSC) off her DD Form 214.
In support of her request, the applicant provided a copy of DD
Form 214.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered the Regular Air Force on 23 Sep 85. She
was honorably retired on 1 Sep 07 and is credited with 21 years,
11 months, and 8 days active service.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIDC recommends denial. Neither the documents the
applicant provided nor the documents included with the
application support the corrective action requested.
DPSIDC states that based on the performance reports available in
the applicants records, they were able to determine that the
applicant performed duty in AFSCs 426X2, Jet Engine Mechanic,
791X0, Public Affairs, and 3N0X1, Public Affairs. Although the
applicant served in AFSC 791X0, effective 1 Nov 93, this AFSC
was later deleted and changed to 3N0X1.
Only an AF Form 2096, Classification or On-the-Job Training
Action, a P-Series Order, PC-III generated AFSC action notice,
or a report on individual person (RIP) can serve as valid source
documents to award an AFSC, not performance reports. DPSIDC
state they cannot support corrective action because they cannot
determine with certainty the length of time the applicant
performed in AFSC 426X2 and the skill level attained.
________________________________________________________________
_
APLICANTS REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 29 Feb 08 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, this office has not received a response.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting
partial relief. We took notice of the applicants complete
submission in judging the merits of the case and although we
were unable to determine that she served in the 426X2 AFSC for
the three years and two months she requested, we do note that
her duty history indicates she performed duties in the 426X2
AFSC for 2 years and 11 months, from 19 Mar 86 to 1 Sep 88. If
she can provide additional documentation to show she performed
for a longer period of time in the 426X2 AFSC the Board is
willing to reconsider her application. Therefore, we recommend
her records be corrected only to the extent indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that her DD
Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,
Block 11, reflect 42652 Jet Engine Mechanic, 2 years 11
months; 3N071 Public Affairs Craftsman, 18 years 10 months
rather than 3N0X1, Public Affairs, 21 years and 9 months.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2007-03372 in Executive Session on 10 June 2008, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
XXXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
XXXXXXXXXXX, Member
XXXXXXXXXXX, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, w/atch, dated 3 Oct 07.
Exhibit B. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIDC, w/atchs, dated
29 Jan 08.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Feb 08.
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02324
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDC recommends denial. The complete DPSIDC evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In her...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02718
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02718 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, states item 11 of the DD Form 214 will reflect the primary AFSC and all additional AFSCs in which the member served for one year or more, during member's continuous active military...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00595
If an individual performed duties in a secondary AFSC, it might be reflected in one of the EPRs or decorations, or in the duty history; however, a secondary AFSC has never been reflected as a separate entry on the SNCO evaluation brief. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 19 Aug 11 for review and...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04656
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDC provides no recommendation, stating, in part, that in the absence of specific source documentation that validates the requested corrective action, they could not determine with any certainty the length of time the applicant performed in each of the Air Force Specialty Codes (AFSCs) and the skill level he attained. The complete AFPC/DPSIDC evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01204
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends the application be denied as untimely. To be awarded the PH, a member must provide documentation to support he or she was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and the wounds must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented...
No AFSC existed for this career field. He requested assignment to a career field for which he had been trained. While he may not have been performing duties in this career field during his last few months in the Air Force, we do believe that it was his last career field in which he performed duties for which he was trained, In view of the above finding, we recommend his records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01985
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01985 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be changed in item 25a, Specialty Number and Title, to reflect an Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) of 43230, Jet Engine Mechanic, rather than 70250,...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03821
DFAS records reflect the decedent elected maximum child only SBP coverage prior to his 1 Sep 89 retirement. Records further contain an annotation that the applicant concurred with the members SBP election prior to his retirement. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03437
However, colonels are managed by the Air Force Colonel Matters Office not AFPC. Counsel discusses the issue of the applicant’s voluntary retirement and points out that the issue at hand is the time in grade (TIG) waiver to allow the applicant to retire in the grade commensurate with her last six years of active service. Also served in colonel positions doing colonels jobs for more than three years while still a lieutenant colonel.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00998
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2009-00998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect an Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) of 55590, Programs and Work Control Superintendent. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission...